<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[larrylevin RSS Feed]]></title>
<link href="http://www.secretsoftraders.com/feeds/traders/larrylevin-17508" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:1c0c76f6-7741-e428-e3d4-e17a84b14bd2</id>
<updated>2010-09-03T16:08:35-07:00</updated>
<author><name>SecretsofTraders.com</name>
</author>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[ISM Follow Up]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1153" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:20d4ce00-ce06-bbd6-b86f-27a797a0bca0</id>
<updated>2010-09-03T06:52:50-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>After an extremely slow Thursday trade, as the market waits on
Friday's Jobs data, I bring you a follow up on Wednesday's ISM
report. As I wrote yesterday it was very odd indeed. Analyst David
Rosenberg agrees, pinpointing what I also thought was quite
curious: regional data simply did NOT even come close to reporting
what the ISM did.</p>
<p>STRANGE ISM NUMBER DOESN'T PASS "SNIFF TEST" Here's why:</p>
<p>1 Most of the regional reports were very poor in August. Either
they collectively all wrong or the ISM is.</p>
<p>2 The share of respondents saying the experienced "growth" was
61%, the exact same as a year ago when the ISM was sitting at
52.8.</p>
<p>3 The ISM gain was led by employment (58.6 to 60.4 - best since
December 1983) in the same month that ADP manufacturing fell 6,000
(second decline in a row - it was -11k in July when ISM employment
was 58.6, so clearly the latter is proving to be, at least for now,
an unreliable labour market barometer). Production also ticked up
to 5…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Psychosis]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1151" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:41720df3-bfb6-85f2-cf83-d3dabaa9395e</id>
<updated>2010-09-02T06:05:29-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>Was Wednesday's massive rally real, or is the market suffering
from psychosis? Was there news that warranted such a move? What
about the volume? Is anything real anymore?</p>
<p>1. Wednesday's volume was lethargic. The NYSE consolidated
volume was just 1.19 billion, which is barely better than the
10-day average and LOWER than Tuesday's. One should expect massive
volume - much greater than the 10-day average - to support such a
wild price swing.</p>
<p>2. ADP jobs data came out before the open and was worse than
expected, showing job losses are increasing.</p>
<p>3. Construction spending was atrocious, coming in far worse than
expected.</p>
<p>4. Auto sales were worse than expected.</p>
<p>5. The "savior" was the ISM manufacturing report that came in at
a reading of 56.3 when the market was expecting 53.0. Bloomberg,
however, didn't pump up the details like I expected... "Lagging
factors gave what is a bit of a deceptive boost to the ISM's
manufacturing index masking a further slowi…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Goodbye August]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1149" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:295e6d5a-8de5-42b0-0fc1-47073f8176d2</id>
<updated>2010-09-01T06:24:19-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>As surely you have heard on many financial stations, August's
volume has been abysmal. Day after day the lack of volume kept the
needed volatility at bay resulting in the choppiest (non-trending)
month we have ever recorded. Eighty six percent of all trading days
in August were classified as #4 days - not good. And when there was
a slight amount of volatility on a given day, it would end as fast
as it started and begin the next excruciatingly long sideways (and
narrow) move. Goodbye August!</p>
<p>The market continues to desperately support the S&amp;P 1040.00
level as well as Dow 10,000 despite the poor economic news. Today
was no different.</p>
<p>Three reports that were said to be very bullish this morning
were the Case-Shiller HPI, the Chicago PMI, and the Consumer
Confidence reports. Of course, this is more propaganda.</p>
<p>The S&amp;P/Case-Shiller index of property values increased 4.2%
from June of last year. However, what I did not see reported
anywhere was the fact that t…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Reversal]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1147" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:bf73399f-f3db-0b02-0b98-fd161c4042b3</id>
<updated>2010-08-31T07:31:35-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>In my last report I wrote..."The market went crazy with glee
last Friday when it found out that the GDP report was close to the
expectations. For a change the inept economists that supply Fraud
Street with its expectations did not embarrass themselves. The
report showed growth two-tenths better than expected.</p>
<p>Unlike inflationary data, the GDP data is annualized to make it
sound more palatable than it really is, just like inflationary data
is reported on a monthly basis to keep it from sounding
catastrophic if one or more months showed a surge in prices. To be
sure, few would be excited over the true monthly GDP growth, which
is just .00133%. Uh huh, real exciting!" It would seem Mr. Market
read this blog and indeed realized that .00133% monthly growth is
nothing to get excited about. The S&amp;P futures nearly gave back
100% of Friday's gains.</p>
<p>Although the market did "eventually" drop a lot, the day's most
prominent feature was its lack of volume. Monday was one of
the…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[GDP Growth?]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1145" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:e64f3607-7f18-8e1d-a7cd-09dae1692197</id>
<updated>2010-08-31T07:28:54-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>The market went crazy with glee last Friday when it found out
that the GDP report was close to the expectations. For a change the
inept economists that supply Fraud Street with its expectations did
not embarrass themselves. The report showed growth two-tenths
better that expected.</p>
<p>Unlike inflationary data, the GDP data is annualized to make it
sound more palatable than it really is, just like inflationary data
is reported on a monthly basis to keep it from sounding
catastrophic if one or more months showed a surge in prices. To be
sure, few would be excited over the true monthly GDP growth, which
is just .00133%. Uh huh, real exciting!</p>
<p>Below we read another quick update on the GDP data from analyst
Dave Rosenberg of Gluskin Sheff &amp; Associates.</p>
<p>REVISIONISTS UNITE!</p>
<p>Like the equity analysts, the economists are now in the process
of cutting their GDP forecasts - but in dribs and drabs, and
nothing very draconian just yet. It is interesting to see that
the…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Housing Part III]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1143" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:3818af7b-768b-a394-d757-cb5c0fc65057</id>
<updated>2010-08-27T06:04:26-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>I have already given the details of the two recent housing
reports; however, today I'd like to give you "Rosie's" perspective
today. Breakfast with Dave is always a good read.</p>
<p>Burning Down the House</p>
<p>Once again, the consensus was fooled. It was looking for 330k on
new home sales for July and instead they sank to a record low of
276k units at an annual rate. And, just to add insult to injury,
June was revised down, to 315k from 330k. Just as resales undercut
the 2009 depressed low by 15%, new home sales have done so by 19%.
Imagine that even with mortgage rates down 100 basis points in the
past year to historic lows, not to mention at least eight different
government programs to spur homeownership, home sales have undercut
the recession lows by double-digits.</p>
<p>In the aftermath of a credit bubble burst and a massive asset
deflation, trauma has set in. The rupture to confidence and
spending from our central bankers' and policymakers' willingness to
allow the prior cr…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Housing II]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1141" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:b5adea0c-1269-357d-d99a-cc344bd037f7</id>
<updated>2010-08-26T07:17:27-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>Before the second shockingly bad housing report was released
today, there was another poor report: durable goods.</p>
<p>Although the durable goods data showed a very modest increase of
+0.3%, it was far below what the so-called experts - economists -
said it would be. Once again, these experts couldn't be more
inaccurate as they predicted a +3.0% reading. Wrong again boys!</p>
<p>JP Morgan said the following...The July durable goods report was
a major disappointment and raises the risk that third quarter GDP
growth prints below 1%. Shipments of core capital goods
(ex-aircraft and defense) fell 1.5%, the most since April 2009, and
orders for core capital goods plunged 8.0%, the most since January
2009. This category is the most important element of the report as
it is the best gauge of business capital spending and it feeds into
the calculation of GDP. Other aspects of the report weren't quite
as bad: total orders were up 0.3%, which was entirely accounted for
by a 76% jump in booki…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Housing]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1139" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:bf7baf60-f5ab-a3a0-2870-5b5698b1db0e</id>
<updated>2010-08-25T06:08:54-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>Existing home sales plummeted last month - big time. Housing
sales have been in a down trend since the government took away the
freebies. Of course that government cheese did nothing but pull
forward future demand - demand that would have occurred naturally
without government giveaways. I knew it. You knew it. But guess who
didn't know it and probably never will: economists.</p>
<p>You' have to be as dumb as an economist to think that housing
was getting better now and that the government handouts were
anything but faux-stimulus. Said another way, you'd have to be as
dumb as an economist to think that government giveaways were real
economic activity. Moreover, you'd have to be as foolish as a
Keynesian devotee to believe that all of the additional debt
doesn't matter.</p>
<p>The program didn't work, yet we're saddled with the massive cost
of the program and politicians are dreaming up even more housing
giveaway schemes.</p>
<p>Bloomberg said, Sales of U.S. previously owned homes plu…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Q3 GDP]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1135" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:c8559eb4-6b95-20f8-5d9b-3cae6574a787</id>
<updated>2010-08-24T06:10:31-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-1136 alignright" title=
"real_gdp_rosenberg" src=
"http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/wp-content/upload/real_gdp_rosenberg-300x185.jpg"
alt="" width="300" height="185"></p>
<p>Today I bring you a quick piece from "Breakfast With Dave."
Analyst Dave Rosenberg from"Gluskin Sheff"believes Q3 data will
come in with a negative reading and economists saying that the
recession never ended.</p>
<p>Our suspicions have been confirmed - the recession never ended.
Macroeconomic Advisers produces a monthly U.S. real GDP series and
it shows that the peak was in April, as we expected, with both May
and June down 0.4% in the worst back-to-back performance since the
economy was crying Uncle! back in the depths of despair in
September-October 2008.</p>
<p>The quarterly data show that Q2 stands at a +1.1% annual rate
(so look for a steep downward revision for last quarter) and the
"build in" for Q3 is -1.5% at an annual rate. Depending on the data
flow through the July-S…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Time of Day and Your Trading]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1133" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:c41396f1-74c3-494e-3eb1-fc41d52a0268</id>
<updated>2010-08-23T08:36:48-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p><strong>Concentration</strong></p>
<p>Off floor day trading from a computer monitor from a "home"
office is particularly challenging and beyond the capability of
most. This is part of the reason why over 95% of such traders fail.
One of the biggest reasons traders fail is that most people are
incapable of maintaining intense concentration for any length of
time.</p>
<p>But that's no reason to give up. Why not?</p>
<p>Because you don't have to be stuck in front of your monitor
every moment of the trading day. Markets develop their own
characteristics and their own flow, which hold true most of the
time. To be in harmony with the flow of the market is a distinct
advantage over those who are not.</p>
<p><strong>Predictable Humans</strong></p>
<p>Most of the time, there are only 2-3 good intra day swings in
the E-mini S&amp;P market. The majority of professionals are happy
to catch 3-4 really good trades a week. For most traders, trades
turn out to be a series of small wins and losses.&lt;…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Death Warmed Over]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1131" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:3c589ab5-a6d9-68cb-6db7-fab2b9100481</id>
<updated>2010-08-23T06:08:56-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>With a title "Death Warmed Over" one might think I was about to
write about my singing career. Oooff, that's bad! No sir, I will
write about the state of the recent stock market, which is death
warmed over indeed.</p>
<p>We expected a large move Thursday and the market delivered -
kind of. Almost as quickly as the sell-off began, it stopped.
Yesterday I said that its overall Market Profile distribution
suggested a lower market followed by a rally. OK, great; the market
delivered again. The "death" and "warmed over"parts, however, are
everything in between!</p>
<p>For example, Thursday the 12th through Monday the 16th the
market traded almost entirely within a 7 point range. Friday's
range was slightly lower than the prior two days but still traded
within the aforementioned band. To be sure, the total range between
the highs and lows were greater, but approximately 80-90% of the
traded there.</p>
<p>Were the subsequent days better because the overall daily gains
or losses were much l…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Data Day]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1129" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:d178e203-4062-da35-4b7a-59182f01a620</id>
<updated>2010-08-20T06:49:47-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>As I stated yesterday in Notes From the Pit, the market was
waiting on today's first data point: weekly jobless claims. The
surprise, however, came from the Philly Fed data. To be sure, both
were horrible once again and the only to be surprised - again -
were U.S. economists.</p>
<p>Consensus economic expectations for weekly jobless claims were
for a bad reading of 480,000. The data reading came in at 500,000,
with the prior week's reading revised worse than initially reported
and the 4-week average of claims climbing as well. Bloomberg said
this "initial claims are piling up, indicating that businesses are
continuing to cut costs. Initial claims came in at 500,000 in the
August 14 week for the largest total since November. The four-week
average of 482,500 is the largest since December. A month-to-month
look shows significant deterioration of 25,000 for a percentage
change of nearly six percent. The Labor Department said special
factors are playing no part in the data."</p>
<p>In th…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[70% Unemployment]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1127" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:402faaed-5fc2-bd18-1588-5ac7a47bf0f0</id>
<updated>2010-08-19T06:49:20-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>It appears that Greece may be making headlines again. But that's
odd; I thought the (Euro) money printing by the ECB had fixed
everything? I also thought that the Greek banks had passed the
so-called "stress tests" with ease? Were the tests another
scam?</p>
<p>Zero Hedge picks up the Greek news, which can be found in its
entirety <a href=
"http://go.madmimi.com/redirects/8889afff87ae9cd5fa35870bc0d4107b?pa=1655001091">
here</a></p>
<p>Those patiently following the Greek Bond-Bund spread to its
inevitable conclusion have been fully aware that the plan that
Europe is betting its entire future on, is patently flawed: namely
that austerity, by its definition does not, and will not work. In
fact, instead of bringing stability, austerity will slowly but
surely eat away at the economy of whatever country it is instituted
in - in some cases slowly, in others, like Greece, very
rapidly.</p>
<p>Indeed, the Greek spread has now risen to levels last seen
during the early May near-revolution in A…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Kyle Bass]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1122" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:d7ae2b43-8ad1-a665-9dd9-21b05a897e90</id>
<updated>2010-08-18T06:07:19-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>I had planned on writing about Tuesday's trading action but was
intrigued by what I saw all over the internet on various websites:
an interview with hedge fund manager, Kyle Bass. At first I ignored
it until it showed up on the 3rd and 4th site I had come across,
which intrigued me enough to watch it. Now I know why its up and I
have to send it along to you. The following videos are rather
shocking because Mr. Bass is allowed to state his case without
being shouted down. His point of view, and facts, are striking
enough to make the host of the show depressed and declare, "I need
a drink." Until then, he had apparently willfully ignored all of
the "other" news around him.</p>
<p>He covers</p>
<ol>
<li>The scam stress tests.</li>
<li>The Keynesian endpoint.</li>
<li>The Japanese economic death spiral.</li>
<li>Demographics.</li>
<li>ZIRP</li>
<li>Central bank money printing</li>
</ol>
<p>...and more.</p>
<p><a href=
"http://go.madmimi.com/redirects/3c98ccae337f55f66c11222153e11ee7?pa=1%E2%80%A6">
</a></p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[More of the Same]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1120" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:9c9d1942-363e-ef47-db30-6a332fef3f0a</id>
<updated>2010-08-17T06:00:32-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>As far as our estimate that Monday or Tuesday would be a
"break-out" type of day, we can scratch off one. Monday was
incredibly slow, with the NYSE notching the lowest volume of the
entire year. Yes indeed folks, it was more of the same...a whole
bunch of nothing.</p>
<p>Before the market opened we were treated to the latest batch of
data from New York, specifically the Empire State Manufacturing
Survey. This report came in below expectations, which surprised
economists - of course. Bloomberg said "The Empire State report
poses bad news for the manufacturing outlook. Readings on new
orders, unfilled orders, and shipments all show month-to-month
deterioration in August. If these readings are repeated in
Thursday's Philadelphia Fed report, expectations will look for a
step lower in the monthly ISM manufacturing report."</p>
<p>"The Empire State's headline index did show improvement, but
this index is the sum of a single subjective question on general
business activity. Again, question…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Stop Trading Without A Stop Loss]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1116" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:d3862c14-15cd-60e0-bfbc-bdb611207402</id>
<updated>2010-08-16T12:32:31-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hardly a week goes by that I don't get an
invitation to sit in on a webinar to learn to trade without stops.
The invitation comes with warnings of the unnecessary losses
traders suffer by using stops. Friends, nothing could be further
from the truth. Sure, you can occasionally get picked off in a stop
sweeping run by placing an inappropriate stop too close to
anticipated support or resistance. However, this is much more
preferable than leaving yourself vulnerable to catastrophic loss by
trading without a stop.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Definition of a Stop Loss</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>A stop loss order is an order to buy or
sell a futures or options position, or a stock, when it reaches the
stated price. When that price is reached, the stop-loss order
becomes a market order and the position is immediately liquidated
at whatever price is available. In a fast market the exercised
price may be far from your stop price; c'est la vie. The
st…</span></p>
</div>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Friday the 13th]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1112" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:1b89637e-7bca-84b2-a422-f8e63ff15fb7</id>
<updated>2010-08-16T06:06:42-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>The trading floor had an eerie silence to it last Friday. The
lights were dimly lit and it seemed like there was a fog rolling
across the trading floor. Then again, maybe my glasses were dirty.
At any rate, it was an odd start to Friday's trade; rather than the
bell being rung at 8:30am central, I heard "Ki-ki-ki,
ma-ma-ma...Ki-ki-ki, ma-ma-ma."</p>
<p>"Am I in Chicago?" I thought. "Or am I at Camp Crystal Lake?"
the setting for the 1980 movie "Friday the 13th."</p>
<p>Although there wasn't a mad killer, Mrs. Voorhees, taking out
traders like camp counselors in the original movie (then son Jason
in the sequels), someone sure slashed the volume and volatility all
to hell last Friday the 13th. Indeed, the market was as lifeless as
said counselors in the movie.</p>
<p>Friday's range was so small it barely spanned 9-points. The vast
majority of the range, perhaps 90%, occurred within a minuscule
range of just 6 crummy points. Moreover, it was so slow - dare I
say DEAD? - that Friday's v…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Cash on the Sidelines]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1110" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:1ae90d55-1b24-298c-4ca7-7e5b88ca669f</id>
<updated>2010-08-13T06:12:14-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p>How often have you heard or read the phrase "There is so much
cash on the sidelines that the stock market is sure to rally - any
time now. Wait for it...wait for it..." Uh huh, right. I'm still
waiting. This drivel is often repeated to get Joe Six-Pack to buy
now, before these fantasy-bucks hit the tape and drive the market
higher. The problem is, it never happens.</p>
<p>This is a nonsensical idea to begin with because when you buy, a
market maker SELLS; thus there is no gain for the market. However,
let's pretend there are reasons why Joe Six-Pack is indeed flush
with cash on the sidelines. OK, the first reason doesn't make him
flush but rather broke, and yes, on the sidelines: unemployment!
Last Friday's monthly jobs data was terrible and this morning's
weekly jobless claims were FAR WORSE than the market expected.
You'd have to be as dumb as an economist to believe it would get
better, but economists are the ones supplying false hope to the
market.</p>
<p>The other reason why th…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Trading Lessons from Tiger Woods]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1108" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:8aaa0311-dcbd-a157-0114-727bcf137cbc</id>
<updated>2010-08-12T09:43:10-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Downfall</strong></p>
<p>The world where we humans live has always been and will always
be a turbulent one. Life progresses smoothly for a while, and then
unexpectedly, it can change. Success becomes failure, and sometimes
failure can turn into a catastrophic loss.</p>
<p>It happens to the best of us, even to someone as successful as
Tiger Woods.</p>
<p>At the height of his career, Tiger was the highest-paid
professional athlete in the world, he was only behind Jack Nicklaus
in the number of times he had won a major professional golf
championship, and he ranked third all time in total number of PGA
Tour events. He seemed unstoppable.</p>
<p>Fast forward to this season, and the story changes quite
dramatically. He is currently only 85th on the PGA Tour money list,
and he is not even in the top 100 in scoring average, driving
accuracy, greens in regulation and putts per round. Last week, he
had his worst 72-hole professional tournament since his very first
one in 1996.</p>
…]]></summary>
</entry>
<entry>
<title type="html" ><![CDATA[Fed Revisited]]></title>
<link href="http://blog.secretsoftraders.com/?p=1106" ></link>
<id>urn:uuid:264a33cd-c72d-b348-a241-83fb3127daa9</id>
<updated>2010-08-12T06:08:14-07:00</updated>
<summary type="html" ><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ktKNEGSqLB4">Unrelated
to the newsletter, but nevertheless a very funny clip sent by one
of my best pupils (Andy L.), I think you'll get a kick out of it:
Click Here to watch!</a></p>
<p>I ended yesterday's newsletter with "Google Wiemar Republic and
Zimbabwe inflation rate. Then pray 'but it's different this time.'"
This was an incomplete thought.</p>
<p>What I mean is; although I believe that there are odds of
Wiemar-like hyperinflation some time in our future, I also believe
those odds are quite remote. If the banks lend out too much money,
both the banks and the Fed (where it came from) will be repaid in
worthless dollars. It is not in their best interests.</p>
<p>What could lead us to this horrible destination, however, are
the glittering-jewels-of-colossal-ignorance in the House of
Representatives and Senate - otherwise known as The Clown Posse. If
these idiots believe that they can spend any sum they choose
without any consequence becau…</p>
]]></summary>
</entry>
</feed>